Family Research Council : Arguments From Personal Science Against Same-Sex Wedding
A sizable and growing human anatomy of systematic proof suggests that the intact, married household is the best for children. In specific, the work of scholars David Popenoe, Linda Waite, Maggie Gallagher, Sara McLanahan, David Blankenhorn, Paul Amato, and Alan Booth has added to the summary.
This declaration from Sara McLanahan, a sociologist at Princeton University, is representative:
We would probably come up with something quite similar to the two-parent ideal if we were asked to design a system for making sure that children’s basic needs were met. This kind of design, in theory, will never just make sure that kids had usage of the money and time of two adults, it would offer something of checks and balances that promoted quality parenting. The truth find venezuelan women that both moms and dads have connection that is biological the kid would raise the likelihood that the moms and dads would determine with all the kid and become ready to lose for that kid, plus it would reduce steadily the chance that either moms and dad would abuse the kid.
Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur, Growing Up with an individual Parent: just just What Hurts, exactly What Helps (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1994) 38.
Listed here are ten science-based arguments against same-sex “marriage”: